PDA

View Full Version : Blackhole?



DavidKleinfeld
10-04-2007, 02:42 AM
Theres a blackhole on googlesky but apparently now it is covered. Anyone know why? Is it just a glitch?

GEH4EVR
10-04-2007, 10:04 AM
David, could you please provide some more information about the location of the blackhole?

-iR
01-02-2008, 09:06 PM
http://images.google.com/images?q=blackhole&sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGGL,GGGL:2006-38,GGGL:en&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi
LOL. As you can see blackholes porably arnt black so it is possible that you could see them in Google Sky

SpiderX22
01-02-2008, 10:42 PM
Indeed it isn't:
http://www.gearthhacks.com/dlfile26844/Black-Hole.htm

DrSinn
04-11-2009, 12:56 AM
Black holes are 'black' your seeing the debris that isent sucked into the hole yet, most likely that black hole is dismantling, or just dismantled a planet or star. They ARE black, no light escapes it. If you look in some pics, you will see a small black spot in the middle, hence black hole. You CAN see the event horizon, as a warped vision if it passes over a star or weakens its light.

neilwilkes
07-01-2009, 04:32 PM
Indeed it isn't:
http://www.gearthhacks.com/dlfile26844/Black-Hole.htm

Sorry, but I see nothing there as evidence of "black holes".
It's highly unlikely such things exist anyway - Schwarzchilds solution did not solve for a singularity & such objects are almost certainly a modern myth.

See http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=qwk0u6cc
and also http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/guest1.htm
for a more detailed discussion.
The universe would appear to be electrical in nature, and this is a far, far stronger force than gravity is and seems to predict & explain things that the gravitational model doesn't. Not only that, the orthodoxy seems to continually need to invent more & more unlikely objects to prop itself up.
Take "Black Holes", for example.
We were told that these are areas where the laws of physics are in abeyance, where the field is so strong that nothing can escape it, not even light.
Oh yes, and Hawking Radiation.
And apparently gases - spewed out at sizeable fractions of the speed of light.
And water vapour http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8012501.stm
Really, you couldn't make this stuff up. Nobody would believe you.
Except that they did on both counts!!

Finally, here's a wonderful picture of something that is clearly electrical in nature. http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2006/arch06/060501twoblackholes.htm

I urge everyone with an open mind to start ploughing through SKY and see what they can find that looks electrical.
A good place to start though is the Thunderbolts site for a quick course in a theory that will almost certainly blow your mind. It did mine!

silentgi77
01-03-2010, 03:43 AM
i saved 15% or more by switching to geico

novousmihi
06-07-2010, 01:00 AM
Sorry, but I see nothing there as evidence of "black holes".
It's highly unlikely such things exist anyway - Schwarzchilds solution did not solve for a singularity & such objects are almost certainly a modern myth.

I am sorry, but Wikipedia begs to differ:

"[...] The Schwarzschild solution, taken to be valid for all r > 0, is called a Schwarzschild black hole. It is a perfectly valid solution of the Einstein field equations, although it has some rather bizarre properties. "

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_metric

Then we have the Kerr Metric which can solve for a rotating black hole, and the Kerr-Newman Metric that solves for a rotating charged black hole.

If anything, we have the math to back up the claims that black holes exist.