freakybarry
08-16-2005, 02:32 PM
any chance we can limit no of attacks & army movement by time?
it's most awesomely frustrating whenver you've successfully captured 3 cities, only to come back in 2hours to find all of them overtaken/nuked and your base camp obliterated.
this would again be a more realistic concept, you could never move 4/5 armies from sydney to london to tokyo in 10 minutes :)
also, on the concept of city wealth accumulation, could a city produce the equivalent of 1 jewel for every 100,000 population every hour?
this would help the owner of a city to maintain defence, and would help better balance the attack patterns - 1000 troops in belfast is ott :), but 10,000 in china would probably be insufficient
==================================
Hey Mickey you're so fine, you're so fine, GEwar blows my mind!
:D
it's most awesomely frustrating whenver you've successfully captured 3 cities, only to come back in 2hours to find all of them overtaken/nuked and your base camp obliterated.
this would again be a more realistic concept, you could never move 4/5 armies from sydney to london to tokyo in 10 minutes :)
also, on the concept of city wealth accumulation, could a city produce the equivalent of 1 jewel for every 100,000 population every hour?
this would help the owner of a city to maintain defence, and would help better balance the attack patterns - 1000 troops in belfast is ott :), but 10,000 in china would probably be insufficient
==================================
Hey Mickey you're so fine, you're so fine, GEwar blows my mind!
:D