PDA

View Full Version : Organize cities by area



birq
09-18-2005, 04:22 PM
Currently in the big city list, you can sort by owner, name, size and armies. It would be good to get a regional view as well. Could you add a column for continent? You could then sort by continent and see all the North American cities together, Asian, Australian, etc. They'll just be divided along geographical lines, and not geopolitical, so it won't change over time.

Mickey
09-18-2005, 05:29 PM
Currently in the big city list, you can sort by owner, name, size and armies. It would be good to get a regional view as well. Could you add a column for continent? You could then sort by continent and see all the North American cities together, Asian, Australian, etc. They'll just be divided along geographical lines, and not geopolitical, so it won't change over time.

Good idea. Not real soon, though. That will require that we tag each existing city with the proper continent, as well as write the code for pulling/sorting based on that.

It's on the to-do list, though. :)

birq
09-18-2005, 05:33 PM
It's on the to-do list, though.

That's all I ask :)

Thanks!

rasqual
09-18-2005, 06:45 PM
Organizing by continent is entirely arbitrary just now. It's not even a logical grouping, distance aside. Until oceans are a real barrier, and until national boundaries are respected in international law, any such groupings will be arbitrary and potentially misleading; the grouping will lend significance to a distinction that really has none (it would be misleading).

My two cents.

birq
09-18-2005, 07:23 PM
Organizing by continent is entirely arbitrary just now. It's not even a logical grouping, distance aside. Until oceans are a real barrier, and until national boundaries are respected in international law, any such groupings will be arbitrary and potentially misleading; the grouping will lend significance to a distinction that really has none (it would be misleading).

My two cents.

Continental grouping is decidedly not arbitrary, which is why I suggested it. Okay, so the line between what is North America and what is South America was arbitrarily decided at one time, but the lines are now so widely accepted, they're inveterate.

The purpose for my suggestion was to be able to see a general area at a glance. Long-term, we should be able to group cities however we want, but until we can get to the point where we each have control over the display of our city groupings, by landmass makes sense to me.

And that's my 0.02 Geos :)

rasqual
09-18-2005, 08:44 PM
Continental grouping is decidedly not arbitrary, which is why I suggested it. Okay, so the line between what is North America and what is South America was arbitrarily decided at one time, but the lines are now so widely accepted, they're inveterate.

The purpose for my suggestion was to be able to see a general area at a glance. Long-term, we should be able to group cities however we want, but until we can get to the point where we each have control over the display of our city groupings, by landmass makes sense to me.

And that's my 0.02 Geos :)

I agree with the logistical purpose, but the value of the grouping is incomplete until oceans act as oceans -- impediments to the movement of forcers which motivate acquisition of navies and air forces.

BTW, at some pont soon, this world is going to have to accommodate civilian activity, such as refugees from embattled cities, changes in the "value" of cities when they're nuked, and so forth. Mickey's challenge is quickly becoming this: as the game scales and features become more realistic, the extent to which features need to be "fleshed out" (by having commensurate features in related conceptual areas of the game also fleshed out) grows non-linearly. That is, a credibility gap widens as emergent properties of changes cause still more dramatic changes.

And so on.