antimonopolistc rules?

[iricigor]

How about adding some antimonopolistic rules?

For example three special cities could not be held by one alliance. I think it would be better to put that one alliance can't have more than one special city!
Or that resource bonus should be divided into two cities and then to restrict ownership on them?

[araT]

This is actually a great idea! what do you think, Mickey?

T.

[blitzkrieg]

Nope, restraining success is not a good idea for maintaining longevity in enjoyment. Imagine paying customers being unable to command there forces because of an unrealistic restraint.

There are lots of good ideas around that have been dusted due to Mickey's other priorities (don't read as an insult)..... Lets rehash some of them instead of this for when Mickey can have more time.

[blitzkrieg]

Having said that antimonopolistic ideas are good.

Many other idea threads;

http://www.googleearthhacks.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4027

http://www.googleearthhacks.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3935

http://www.googleearthhacks.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3845

http://www.googleearthhacks.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3813

http://www.googleearthhacks.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3776

http://www.googleearthhacks.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3765

http://www.googleearthhacks.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3759

http://www.googleearthhacks.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3682

http://www.googleearthhacks.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3683

http://www.googleearthhacks.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3495

I started to notice most of my links were my idea, so I added a few other goodies including Mickey's own bank feature that was never introduced.

All these are summed up with this thread.

http://www.googleearthhacks.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3758

[araT]

Good point blitz, and thanks for all the work linking to old ideas.. I'm going to lock this thread so that people post in the original thread regarding ideas, rather than here.

- LOCKED -

T.