Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Group Account

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    356

    Default Group Account

    I would like to have a bank account for my allies. An account that all members of an alliance would put in geos.
    One person would be voted as controller of the geos and request for funds would be voted on by all members of an allaince.
    There would be a set amount of geos that coud be withdrawn.

    Any thoughts on this?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    632

    Default

    No need, you can transfer Geos to anyone u want...

  3. #3

    Default

    Not a bad idea. One person in the alliance receives whatever Geo's every person of the allie can spend to build up one big account.
    And also puts the interest back on that account.
    But... each one can withdraw from that if one keeps an eye that the person is spending it wisely. Not just attacking everyone arround him/her.
    Last edited by Lukepuuk; 09-18-2005 at 12:36 AM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukepuuk
    every person can miss
    What do you mean?

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by War_Peace
    What do you mean?
    Sorry, bad translation from Dutch to English(it IS already 2:36am here, so i'm using that as an excuse).
    I rectified it.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    632

    Default

    Last edited by Lukepuuk : Today at 03:36 AM

    Ahh, ok then...

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by War_Peace
    No need, you can transfer Geos to anyone u want...
    I know but with a account like this everyone in a alliance would be putting in geos. This would be a center point of collection. Lets say a 9 member alliance puts in 1/2 of daily diamond mine earnings 200 (which isnt much) that would be 1800 and over two days 3600 (this would be a few geos). When one of the allies needs jewels for a mission or help recovering looses it would be there.
    this account would need to be controlled.

  8. #8

    Default

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Last edited by Lukepuuk : Today at 02:36 AM.

    One hour earlier here I guess, but practically sleeping and posting messages in English is not a very good combination.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anthonywitt
    I know but with a account like this everyone in a alliance would be putting in geos. This would be a center point of collection. Lets say a 9 member alliance puts in 1/2 of daily diamond mine earnings 200 (which isnt much) that would be 1800 and over two days 3600 (this would be a few geos). When one of the allies needs jewels for a mission or help recovering looses it would be there.
    this account would need to be controlled.
    Yeah, as I also explained in PM, you need to be sure a member of the alliance is spending it well. You don't want people just attacking all their neighbours for fun or vengeance from this money. Should be talked over all the time.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukepuuk
    Not a bad idea. One person in the alliance receives whatever Geo's every person of the allie can spend to build up one big account.
    And also puts the interest back on that account.
    But... each one can withdraw from that if one keeps an eye that the person is spending it wisely. Not just attacking everyone arround him/her.
    Interest. I forgot about that.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukepuuk
    Yeah, as I also explained in PM, you need to be sure a member of the alliance is spending it well. You don't want people just attacking all their neighbours for fun or vengeance from this money. Should be talked over all the time.
    In my suggestion I want all members to vote on a request.

  12. #12

    Default

    A computer controlled account would be better then a person.
    So a shared account...but that would take some programming from Mickey.
    First you would have to be able to make an account.
    Then the one making it would have to appoint which persons could use it.
    A password wouldn't do it. Too vulnerable.
    Last edited by Lukepuuk; 09-18-2005 at 12:56 AM.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    632

    Default

    Still think no need...

    No advantages at all...

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukepuuk
    A computer controlled account would be better then a person.
    So a shared account...but that would take some programming from Mickey.
    First you would have to be able to make an account.
    Then the one making it would have to appoint which persons could use it.
    A password wouldn't do it. Too vulnerable.
    Would it be that hard? Could one of the Alliance create a new member account with the name of the alliance? A mew member account.
    Last edited by anthonywitt; 09-18-2005 at 01:13 AM.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by War_Peace
    Still think no need...

    No advantages at all...
    Interest. It would compound interest. Thats an advantage dont you think?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •