Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: antimonopolistc rules?

  1. #1
    Member iricigor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New Belgrade, Serbia & Montenegro
    Posts
    60

    Default antimonopolistc rules?

    How about adding some antimonopolistic rules?

    For example three special cities could not be held by one alliance. I think it would be better to put that one alliance can't have more than one special city!
    Or that resource bonus should be divided into two cities and then to restrict ownership on them?
    Igor Irić
    New Belgrade, Serbia & Montenegro

  2. #2
    Licensed to Ban araT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Oz
    Posts
    1,244

    Default

    This is actually a great idea! what do you think, Mickey?

    T.

  3. #3
    Senior Member blitzkrieg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Nope, restraining success is not a good idea for maintaining longevity in enjoyment. Imagine paying customers being unable to command there forces because of an unrealistic restraint.

    There are lots of good ideas around that have been dusted due to Mickey's other priorities (don't read as an insult)..... Lets rehash some of them instead of this for when Mickey can have more time.

  4. #4

  5. #5
    Licensed to Ban araT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Oz
    Posts
    1,244

    Default

    Good point blitz, and thanks for all the work linking to old ideas.. I'm going to lock this thread so that people post in the original thread regarding ideas, rather than here.

    - LOCKED -

    T.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •