Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: KableKiB OUTSIDE OF MONTREAL!

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Junior Member Billy Mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    11

    Default KableKiB OUTSIDE OF MONTREAL!

    Attacker size: 100 troops
    Defender size: 125600 troops

    Attacking army lost 13 troops.
    Defending army lost 6 troops.
    Defending army lost 3 troops.
    Attacking army lost 1 troop.
    Attacking army lost 6 troops.
    Defending army lost 13 troops.
    Attacking army lost 4 troops.
    Attacking army lost 6 troops.
    Defending army lost 1 troop.
    Defending army lost 12 troops.
    Defending army lost 9 troops.
    Defending army lost 12 troops.
    Attacking army lost 12 troops.
    Defending army lost 11 troops.
    Defending army lost 3 troops.
    Defending army lost 4 troops.
    Defending army lost 12 troops.
    Defending army lost 14 troops.
    Defending army lost 2 troops.
    Defending army lost 2 troops.
    Attacking army lost 14 troops.
    Defending army lost 13 troops.
    Attacking army lost 5 troops.
    Attacking army lost 11 troops.
    Attacking army lost 1 troop.
    Defending army lost 3 troops.
    Defending army lost 2 troops.
    Defending army lost 15 troops.
    Defending army lost 12 troops.
    Defending army lost 11 troops.
    Defending army lost 9 troops.
    Defending army lost 14 troops.
    Attacking army lost 8 troops.
    Defending army lost 4 troops.
    Defending army lost 11 troops.
    Attacking army lost 1 troop.
    Defending army lost 6 troops.
    Defending army lost 10 troops.
    Defending army lost 1 troop.
    Attacking army lost 1 troop.
    Attacking army lost 14 troops.
    Attacking army lost 10 troops.

    Attacking army killed (118).

  2. #2
    Licensed to Ban araT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Oz
    Posts
    1,244

    Default

    Whats the problem?

    If your whinging about how many of your own men got killed in that fight, its just how the "random" script works, sometimes it works on your behalf, sometimes not.. if everything was 50/50 it would be boring and unrealistic

    T.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2

    Default hehehehe

    I know how ya feel Billy. I think people been saving up. just to see i sent 100 troops to cologne. oh yeah........190k....my poor brave soldiers. didn't stand a chance

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tubby5365
    I know how ya feel Billy. I think people been saving up. just to see i sent 100 troops to cologne. oh yeah........190k....my poor brave soldiers. didn't stand a chance
    most likely they cheated. someone who has only one city but 130K troops in it needs to pay a lot only for having these troops alive. what's the sense of that at all?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bueth
    most likely they cheated. someone who has only one city but 130K troops in it needs to pay a lot only for having these troops alive. what's the sense of that at all?
    Hey bueth not everyone cheats. I dont know about the rest of the members but the cheating subject needs to stop. This is not good.

    AraT how can this subject go away?

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    665

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by araT
    Whats the problem?

    If your whinging about how many of your own men got killed in that fight, its just how the "random" script works, sometimes it works on your behalf, sometimes not.. if everything was 50/50 it would be boring and unrealistic

    T.
    is this sarcasm T?

    we're suggesting they're cheating, or we'd have to admit they're better then us! Help! save our ego's! and geo's!

    hmm, ego, geo, coincedence? i think not.

  7. #7
    Junior Member Billy Mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by araT
    Whats the problem?

    If your whinging about how many of your own men got killed in that fight, its just how the "random" script works, sometimes it works on your behalf, sometimes not.. if everything was 50/50 it would be boring and unrealistic

    T.
    You misinterpret me.
    Who cares about the 100 troops I lost.
    It's a heads up on the 125,000 troops I lost against!

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by araT
    Whats the problem?

    If your whinging about how many of your own men got killed in that fight, its just how the "random" script works, sometimes it works on your behalf, sometimes not.. if everything was 50/50 it would be boring and unrealistic

    T.
    Well araT how many wars you been in?

  9. #9

    Default I'm not saying they are cheating

    I am not saying whoknows is cheating....I'm actually proud of the numbers he/she has put up....I have no idea how they did it but WOW!!!!

    -whoknows has 22 cites...nuke shield on all =$5,500 geos

    -in taking/defending those cities he/she has lost around 652,903 troops. This is about $48,980 geos (using 13.33 troops per geo)

    -based on tubby's post he/she has 180k in Cologne. This is another $13,503 geos

    In total whoknows has spent a minimum of $67,983 geos. If they have 180k in Cologne I would love to see how many they have in cape town and some of the other big cities.

    whoknows must be the most patient person on here....building his/her empire. Obviously one or more people have given them some geos (which is part of the game)......


    my hat goes off to them....


    again.....WOW....

  10. #10

    Default My Bad

    i just seen in another post not to mention any names.....i thought we just couldn't name names when calling people cheaters....

    I don't think whoknows is cheating....i just think they are very patient.


    sorry for not reading other posts before this one....

    I do think he/she should be nominated for the best series of attacks since the last reset

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WILDCAT1976
    i just seen in another post not to mention any names.....i thought we just couldn't name names when calling people cheaters....

    I don't think whoknows is cheating....i just think they are very patient.


    sorry for not reading other posts before this one....

    I do think he/she should be nominated for the best series of attacks since the last reset
    (Psssttt....over here...)
    http://www.googleearthhacks.com/foru...ead.php?t=4302

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •