Google Earth Hacks Forums  

Go Back   Google Earth Hacks Forums > General > Site Issues and Questions

Site Issues and Questions Having problems with the site? Any suggestions for us?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-17-2005, 01:59 PM   #1
qwertz
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Linz, Austria
Posts: 26
Send a message via MSN to qwertz
Default Double-check your files

Hi,

I uploaded a file on Hans Island in the northern arctic (dispute between Canada and Denmark) and you said it was denied because it was already on file. I finally found the one you have via your search engine. There is no included history about the island and the Placemark is in the wrong place.

If you find a duplicate, can you compare and see which has more information for the people, please. I see a lot of the submitters go to a lot of trouble to include historical/geographical information in their files. This is great as GE is a great learning tool.

I know this may create more work for you but to create accurate files I think it is necessary.

Thanks.
qwertz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 02:08 PM   #2
araT
Licensed to Ban
 
araT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Oz
Posts: 1,244
Default

I disagree.. Here is both the original information, submitted by prettygoodcarpenter, and your info:

prettygoodcarpenter (original poster)
Description: Hans Island (Greenlandic/Inuktitut: Tartupaluk, French: Île Hans, Danish: Hans Ø) is a small uninhabited barren knoll measuring 1.3 km² (0.5 mi²), located at approximately 80° 49′ 41″ N 66° 38′ 46″ W in the centre of the Kennedy Channel of Nares Strait—the strait that separates Ellesmere Island from Northern Greenland and connects Baffin Bay with the Lincoln Sea. Hans Island is the smallest of three islands located in Kennedy Channel; the others are Franklin Island and Crozier Island.

The island is claimed by both Canada and Denmark. The dispute may turn into a test case on sovereignty claims along the Northwest Passage, a region that could become more important if climate change opens it up to more shipping.

---

qwertz
Description: - A small island in the north claimed jointly by Canada and Denmark since 1973 and now making the news again.

---

Now according to prettygoodcarpenter (and Wikipedia ), the island is 1.3kms long, the island you placemarked is 6kms.. Sorry.

T.

Last edited by araT; 08-17-2005 at 02:18 PM.
araT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 06:52 AM   #3
qwertz
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Linz, Austria
Posts: 26
Send a message via MSN to qwertz
Default Oops, Sorry!

Oops, Sorry! I took my info from an atlas which showed the larger island as Hans Island. Guess I'm going to have start using Wikapedia. Thanks!
qwertz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 08:12 AM   #4
Stadsman
Super Muderator
 
Stadsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 52°21'24.37"N, 4°51'13.83"E
Posts: 261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by qwertz
Oops, Sorry! I took my info from an atlas which showed the larger island as Hans Island. Guess I'm going to have start using Wikapedia. Thanks!
Wikipedia is NOT a reliable source! It is a great initiative, with some great info, but based solely on open submission. As an academic, I've seen MANY mistakes in Wikipedia, some minor, some big ones. It's good for using as a quick check-up, to confirm something. But never use it as definitive source; a good atlas or a more reliable site like Encarta is better suited for that.
__________________

Stadsman
__________________

"Sponges grow in the ocean. That just kills me. I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be if that didn't happen."
-- Steven Wright
Stadsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 08:21 AM   #5
araT
Licensed to Ban
 
araT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Oz
Posts: 1,244
Default

Stadsman; I completely agree, but in this instance all of the sources online, including encarta and brittanica were saying it was the "smallest of the 3 islands" and "1.3kms" or "0.5 miles" (same diff), I chose to go off wikipedia because it was the most recognised source.. and had the most information in one spot.. i *could* point you to another 20 URLs that will tell you the same info across 20 pages.

Wikipedia is just a social encyclopedia where anyone can enter whatever data they like, its up to the wise of us to edit it..

T.
araT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.