This is a thing that I can't stand! Would u!?...

War_Peace · 09-10-2005, 12:46 PM

I know that the system works randomly and that is what pisses me off. Resources is a gamble, ok. But what the sense has this one right here!!?...

Attacker size: 128 troops
Defender size: 100 troops

Attacking army lost 47 troops.
Attacking army lost 50 troops.
Defending army lost 24 troops.
Attacking army lost 25 troops.
Attacking army lost 2 troops.
Attacking army lost 49 troops.

Attacking army killed (02)

Mickey · 09-10-2005, 01:59 PM

It happens. Get over it.

War_Peace · 09-10-2005, 02:51 PM

Still think that the gamble factor should be removed. It should be either more troops beat less troops or a ranking system...

His Lord Uberdude · 09-10-2005, 03:08 PM

If you wanna look at history, these things happened quite a few times. Especially with such a small difference between between the armies.
Besides, what were you doing with an army of 128?

Lukepuuk · 09-10-2005, 03:13 PM

That's the fun thing about it.
This means in theorie that when you are lucky you could defeat an army of 10.000 with an army of 7.000....if you're extremely lucky that is.

War_Peace · 09-10-2005, 03:28 PM

If I want to use my luck I go and buy a lottery ticket... That thing makes no sense...

Lukepuuk · 09-10-2005, 03:30 PM

That's it...how about a global lottery :P

Costs 100Geo's. Winner takes all.

His Lord Uberdude · 09-10-2005, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lukepuuk

That's it...how about a global lottery :P

Costs 100Geo's. Winner takes all.

I'm in! Lemme know when you're taking money.

Lukepuuk · 09-10-2005, 04:22 PM

Depends on Mickey

Every day at 12:00am somebody wins the lottery. How much you win depends on how many people bought a ticket.

If a 100 people entered you would win 10.000 Geo's. Not bad...I would play.

Beezer · 09-11-2005, 12:36 AM

There are several instances in history where smaller armies have defeated larger ones. Next time, just uses larger armies to attack with if you want to ensure a victory.

Charlemagne · 09-11-2005, 01:24 AM

Oktober 25, 1415, battle of Agincourt.

6000 english soldiers fighting against 25000 man of France.
The english won, losing about 200 man, against a loss of 11000 Frensh...

Greetings,

accurrent · 09-11-2005, 02:26 AM

Hey, look at the US, we defeated Britain (nothing personal).

Lukepuuk · 09-11-2005, 02:35 AM

And then you started fighting eachother.
And that's how warfare is here. Just 2 armies walking towars eachother, shooting in turns...just like the American civil war.

War_Peace · 09-11-2005, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beezer

There are several instances in history where smaller armies have defeated larger ones. Next time, just uses larger armies to attack with if you want to ensure a victory.

Really now!!?... Then, bring the "4-star"ing (focking) ranking system!!...

Lukepuuk · 09-11-2005, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMow

It will also be a much smaller contingent that will defeat the US in Iraq...and of course Viet Nam had the disadvantage as well...

That is why perhaps a defending army should be in the advantage.
Almost everywhere in history the attacking army had to be at least twice as big as the defending one.
Now that doesn't have to be here, but a small percentage wouldn't matter.
But maybe other factors should come in order with this first...maybe being able to upgrade your armies or anything.

09-10-2005, 12:46 PM	#1
War_Peace Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 632	This is a thing that I can't stand! Would u!?... I know that the system works randomly and that is what pisses me off. Resources is a gamble, ok. But what the sense has this one right here!!?... Attacker size: 128 troops Defender size: 100 troops Attacking army lost 47 troops. Attacking army lost 50 troops. Defending army lost 24 troops. Attacking army lost 25 troops. Attacking army lost 2 troops. Attacking army lost 49 troops. Attacking army killed (02)

09-10-2005, 03:08 PM	#4
His Lord Uberdude Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 304	If you wanna look at history, these things happened quite a few times. Especially with such a small difference between between the armies. Besides, what were you doing with an army of 128? __________________ New, the Unofficial Site of GEwar. A trashtalk forum for all players. Check it out: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Now with GAMES, so even if you can't be the best at GEWar, maybe you can set some highscores. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

09-10-2005, 01:59 PM	#2
Mickey Administrator Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 2,327	It happens. Get over it.

09-10-2005, 02:51 PM	#3
War_Peace Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 632	Still think that the gamble factor should be removed. It should be either more troops beat less troops or a ranking system...

09-10-2005, 03:13 PM	#5
Lukepuuk Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 847	That's the fun thing about it. This means in theorie that when you are lucky you could defeat an army of 10.000 with an army of 7.000....if you're extremely lucky that is.

09-10-2005, 03:28 PM	#6
War_Peace Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 632	If I want to use my luck I go and buy a lottery ticket... That thing makes no sense...

09-10-2005, 03:30 PM	#7
Lukepuuk Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 847	That's it...how about a global lottery :P Costs 100Geo's. Winner takes all.

09-10-2005, 04:22 PM	#9
Lukepuuk Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 847	Depends on Mickey Every day at 12:00am somebody wins the lottery. How much you win depends on how many people bought a ticket. If a 100 people entered you would win 10.000 Geo's. Not bad...I would play.

09-11-2005, 12:36 AM	#10
Beezer Master of the Universe Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: In a house Posts: 524	There are several instances in history where smaller armies have defeated larger ones. Next time, just uses larger armies to attack with if you want to ensure a victory.

09-11-2005, 01:24 AM	#11
Charlemagne Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Gorredijk, Netherlands Posts: 43	Oktober 25, 1415, battle of Agincourt. 6000 english soldiers fighting against 25000 man of France. The english won, losing about 200 man, against a loss of 11000 Frensh... Greetings,

09-11-2005, 02:26 AM	#12
accurrent Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 6	Hey, look at the US, we defeated Britain (nothing personal).

09-11-2005, 02:35 AM	#13
Lukepuuk Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 847	And then you started fighting eachother. And that's how warfare is here. Just 2 armies walking towars eachother, shooting in turns...just like the American civil war.