Google Earth Hacks Forums  

Go Back   Google Earth Hacks Forums > Google Earth > Google Earth Applications > GEwar > Alliances / Trash Talk

Alliances / Trash Talk Use this forum to discuss potential alliances or to smack talk other players. Please keep your language and attitude clean.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2005, 01:26 AM   #1
rod
Junior Member
 
rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 17
Send a message via MSN to rod
Default what of this "NILLA"

dis' nilla guy is real pain in the *ss I'm a noob (ouch) and I had the misfortune of attacking nilla with umm.. 900 troopsya i know but honestly! 169,000 troops in one army! OMG!

I think i'll stay away from him for awhile

Last edited by rod; 09-14-2005 at 01:31 AM.
rod is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 01:31 AM   #2
Lukepuuk
Senior Member
 
Lukepuuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 847
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rod
dis' nilla guy is real pain in the *ss I'm a noob (ouch) and I had the misfortune of attacking nilla with umm.. 900 troopsya i know but honestly! 169,000 troops in one army! OMG!

I think i'll stay away from him for awhile
LOL

He must be one great 'script' writer.
As i said in another topic today.
At the new code entry for the jewels it might be better to put the letters back instead of numbers only...and turn them around in random. Some 90 degrees and some 45 and put some more stripes in it.
Should make it near to impossible to cheat anymore.
Lukepuuk is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 01:34 AM   #3
rod
Junior Member
 
rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 17
Send a message via MSN to rod
Default

ya I read that thread. and I think he must be scripting cuz he's the top player in the players list
rod is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 03:30 AM   #4
rasqual
Senior Member
 
rasqual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukepuuk
LOL

He must be one great 'script' writer.
As i said in another topic today.
At the new code entry for the jewels it might be better to put the letters back instead of numbers only...and turn them around in random. Some 90 degrees and some 45 and put some more stripes in it.
Should make it near to impossible to cheat anymore.
No. It merely reduces the number of scripters. You can roll your own OCR when the pattern's predictable.

Mickey, you won't defeat it without more variable orthography, not to mention luminance and hue variation. Obfuscation's a heckuva challenge.
rasqual is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 04:15 AM   #5
Mickey
Administrator
 
Mickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rasqual
...hue variation...
Such as it has now?

Quote:
Obfuscation's a heckuva challenge.
Yes indeed. Think of all of the cool stuff I could be building if I didn't have to deal with this garbage...
Mickey is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 04:58 AM   #6
rasqual
Senior Member
 
rasqual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey
Such as it has now?


Yes indeed. Think of all of the cool stuff I could be building if I didn't have to deal with this garbage...
Aack! My eyes!

Hey, dude. at this point, how about stringing brief clips together and just downloading wav files that read the numbers? You know, the:

<BGSOUND SRC="dude!.wav">

thing? Again, build the file on the server side, and include some random clip ellision before concatenation stuff, so MD5 couldn't be done on a full enumeration of permutations (it wouldn't take anything to build a library of such, if you didn't do this, and exploit that to script it).

Now, here's the trick. You do this ON TOP OF the embedded-in-CDATA method I've suggested a couple times. So in the GE UI, you click one of a half-dozen random links, AND then the user waits for a wav, and enters what's read in the text box and sends.

Eh?

You could even offer words, not just characters. Seriously.

And if you want to be ADA compliant, you offer an option for either way.
rasqual is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 06:00 AM   #7
Brendo
Member
 
Brendo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (27°22'34.69"S, 152°59'18.54"E)
Posts: 96
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rasqual
Aack! My eyes!
Atleast it is easier to see then black and white with lines and dots.

Why is Nilla abandoning all his posts?!?!?!?

Look at all those unoccupied cities
Brendo is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 01:02 PM   #8
Lukepuuk
Senior Member
 
Lukepuuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 847
Default

Way better.
For me it's even better to see and i predict it's a little harder for scripters.
Lukepuuk is offline  
Old 09-15-2005, 01:32 AM   #9
Corporal
Member
 
Corporal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 83
Send a message via AIM to Corporal Send a message via MSN to Corporal
Default

I sometimes have a hard time distinguishing 1's and 7's and 3's and 8's in the new verification thingy. =|
Corporal is offline  
Old 09-15-2005, 03:23 AM   #10
Mickey
Administrator
 
Mickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corporal
I sometimes have a hard time distinguishing 1's and 7's and 3's and 8's in the new verification thingy. =|
Yeah, me too. Of course, that means it's hard for OCR systems to distinguish them too.

I'll keep tweaking it until I find a good balance.
Mickey is offline  
Old 09-15-2005, 06:11 AM   #11
Nilla
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8
Default

larger image

pro's: easier to read, harder to ocr(kinda)

con's: more bandwidth.
Nilla is offline  
Old 09-15-2005, 07:54 AM   #12
anthonywitt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 356
Default

Nilla what do you men by "kinda". You been cheating?
anthonywitt is offline  
Old 09-15-2005, 07:58 AM   #13
anthonywitt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 356
Default "verification thingy"

I like the new "verification thingy" it keeps "kinda" from......The colors are nice.
anthonywitt is offline  
Old 09-15-2005, 07:58 AM   #14
Brendo
Member
 
Brendo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (27°22'34.69"S, 152°59'18.54"E)
Posts: 96
Default

Doesn't a higher dpi make ocr programs really slow - well take them longer anyway. Does a higher dpi also equal a bigger picture.
Brendo is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.